Benchmark Any Bank In One Click

See how a bank compares with same-quarter peers across capital, asset quality, liquidity, earnings and efficiency, built from official public data.

Sample Report

Prairie Community Bank

Fictional bank · $250M–$1B peer group

54

of 100

Overall peer position out of 100. Higher means closer to or better than the peer median.

Tier
Noncurrent
Loan
Return
Net
Efficiency

What The Benchmark Includes

Every report uses the same quarter for the bank and its peers, so the comparison is fair.

Peer Group

Banks with the same charter type and asset band in the same state, widening to the region when there are fewer than five, with the peer count shown.

Asset Quality

Noncurrent loans as a share of total loans, with the peer median and percentile.

Liquidity

Loan-to-deposit ratio and total deposits, showing funding concentration.

Earnings

Return on assets, return on equity and net interest margin.

Efficiency

Efficiency ratio, showing how much it costs to earn each dollar of revenue.

Size And Profile

Total assets, net loans, charter class, primary regulator and community bank status.

Enforcement History

Public enforcement actions from the FDIC, OCC and Federal Reserve, with dates and links.

CRA

The latest public CRA rating, exam date and examining agency, compared with the peer group’s rating mix.

Talk Tracks

Plain-English questions to raise for each measure that stands out from peers.

Recommendations

Practical next steps for each flagged area, written for compliance and leadership teams.

Sample Benchmark Report

This example uses made-up numbers for a fictional bank to show how a report looks.

Prairie Community Bank

Sample report

Sample peer group: State nonmember banks · $250M–$1B assets · Oklahoma · 24 peers

Sample Data

54

of 100

2

Strengths

3

Watch

1

Flags

Sample Peer Banks (24)

Fictional names for illustration. Real reports list the actual peer banks.

  • Peer Bank A
  • Peer Bank B
  • Peer Bank C
  • Peer Bank D
  • Peer Bank E
  • Peer Bank F
  • and 18 more

Tier 1 Leverage

Bank 9.8% · Peer median 10.6%

Peer range 8.1% – 14.2%

38th percentile among peers

Noncurrent Loans

Bank 0.42% · Peer median 0.61%

Peer range 0.05% – 2.31%

72nd percentile among peers

Loan To Deposit

Bank 88.1% · Peer median 79.4%

Peer range 52.3% – 101.6%

31st percentile among peers

Return On Assets

Bank 1.12% · Peer median 1.04%

Peer range 0.31% – 1.88%

58th percentile among peers

Net Interest Margin

Bank 3.71% · Peer median 3.52%

Peer range 2.64% – 4.45%

63rd percentile among peers

Efficiency Ratio

Bank 64.2% · Peer median 66.9%

Peer range 48.7% – 88.2%

61st percentile among peers

CRA Rating Vs Peer Rating Mix

Sample bank: Satisfactory

  • Outstanding4
  • Satisfactory19
  • Needs to Improve1
  • Substantial Noncompliance0

Outstanding Vs Satisfactory Peers

Sample peer group: 4 rated Outstanding, 19 rated Satisfactory.

  • Lending Test

    Loan-to-deposit ratio

    Outstanding Peers
    84%
    Satisfactory Peers
    76%
    This Bank
    71%

    What To Do To Move Up: Lift lending relative to deposits by expanding local loan programs or participations, and document reasons if the ratio stays below peers.

    Source: FFIEC Call Report (via FDIC BankFind)
  • Lending Test

    Share of lending inside the assessment area

    Outstanding Peers
    85%
    Satisfactory Peers
    72%
    This Bank
    68%

    What To Do To Move Up: Track loans by geography each quarter and steer outreach so a clear majority of loans stay inside the assessment area.

    Source: FFIEC CRA and HMDA disclosure data
  • Lending Test

    Lending to low/moderate-income borrowers and geographies

    Outstanding Peers
    Above demographics
    Satisfactory Peers
    Near demographics
    This Bank
    Below demographics

    What To Do To Move Up: Compare your borrower and tract mix with census and aggregate lender data, then set targets and outreach for LMI borrowers and tracts.

    Source: FFIEC CRA and HMDA disclosure data
  • Lending Test

    Small business/farm lending

    Outstanding Peers
    Strong share to small businesses/farms
    Satisfactory Peers
    Reasonable share
    This Bank
    Limited share

    What To Do To Move Up: Add small-dollar business and farm products and record revenue data so loans to businesses under $1 million can be counted.

    Source: FFIEC CRA and HMDA disclosure data
  • Investment Test

    Qualified investments and donations (share of assets/capital)

    Outstanding Peers
    Significant level
    Satisfactory Peers
    Adequate level
    This Bank
    Limited level

    What To Do To Move Up: Set an annual budget for qualified investments such as LMI-targeted bonds, CDFI deposits and affordable-housing funds, and keep documentation.

    Source: Public CRA performance evaluations
  • Service Test

    Branches in LMI areas

    Outstanding Peers
    Readily accessible
    Satisfactory Peers
    Reasonably accessible
    This Bank
    Few LMI locations

    What To Do To Move Up: Map branches and ATMs against LMI tracts; review hours and consider a branch, ATM or mobile service where access is thin.

    Source: Public CRA performance evaluations
  • Service Test

    Community development service hours

    Outstanding Peers
    Leadership roles
    Satisfactory Peers
    Regular participation
    This Bank
    Few documented hours

    What To Do To Move Up: Log staff hours on financial education and nonprofit boards that serve LMI people, with dates and the community purpose.

    Source: Public CRA performance evaluations
  • Service Test

    Alternative delivery systems

    Outstanding Peers
    Shown effective for LMI use
    Satisfactory Peers
    Available
    This Bank
    Not documented

    What To Do To Move Up: Show how online, mobile and low-cost accounts reach LMI customers, using usage data where possible.

    Source: Public CRA performance evaluations
  • Community Development

    Community development loans

    Outstanding Peers
    Leader in the area
    Satisfactory Peers
    Adequate level
    This Bank
    Few loans

    What To Do To Move Up: Identify affordable-housing, small-business and revitalization projects in the area and record them as community development loans.

    Source: Public CRA performance evaluations
  • Innovation

    Innovative/flexible products

    Outstanding Peers
    Several flexible programs
    Satisfactory Peers
    Some flexibility
    This Bank
    None noted

    What To Do To Move Up: Offer flexible underwriting such as lower down payments, credit-builder loans or special-purpose credit programs, and track results.

    Source: Public CRA performance evaluations

Sample values are illustrative only and do not describe a real bank.

What Outstanding Banks Do Differently
  • Lend a clear majority of loans inside the assessment area, with an LMI borrower and tract mix at or above demographics.
  • Make community development loans and qualified investments a planned, budgeted program rather than occasional activity.
  • Keep branches, ATMs and digital services accessible in LMI areas and document how LMI customers use them.
  • Have staff lead, not just attend, community development services, with hours and purpose recorded.
  • Offer flexible or innovative products and track their results for LMI and small-business customers.
Steps To Move Up A Rating
  1. 1Read your latest public performance evaluation and list each weakness the examiners noted.
  2. 2Compare your lending geography and borrower mix with peers and demographics each quarter.
  3. 3Set yearly targets for community development loans, investments and service hours, with an owner for each.
  4. 4Document everything in one CRA file so examiners can see the activity and its community purpose.
  5. 5Review progress with the board before the next exam cycle and adjust where results lag.

General guidance drawn from patterns in public CRA performance evaluations. It is not a guarantee of any rating; examiners weigh each bank's performance context, assessment area and community needs.

Safety-and-soundness exam results (including confidential regulatory ratings) are confidential supervisory information. BluePen never shows or estimates them.

Talk Track

How are funding concentrations and liquidity needs managed as loan-to-deposit runs above peers?

Recommendation

Review the contingency funding plan and liquidity stress testing against current loan growth.

Built from public FDIC/FFIEC/OCC/Federal Reserve data; not an exam finding or rating.

Download As A PDF

Every report exports to a clean, branded PDF you can share with your board, examiners or a bank you advise.

Illustrative BluePen PDF report with financial measures, peer comparisons and discussion priorities

For Banks

Build your own benchmark with one click. Your reports appear in your Bank Dashboard.

For Consultants

Benchmark any bank in the Directory, download it as a PDF to share, and find every report filed under the bank's name on your Saved Banks page.